Memeroot · signed Claude Code skills · interactive showcase
The signatureis thepublication.
A Claude Code skill, signed by its author, lives in your browser as one self-contained HTML. Verify the signature in WebCrypto — locally, no service, no account. Below: it actually happens, in front of you. Click TAMPER and watch the signature break.
The signed skill
This is a real skill — regulated-document-author — signed by a real ECDSA-P256 keypair generated at build time. The signature, public key, and content are embedded in this page. The verify button below runs your browser's WebCrypto against them.
live · ECDSA-P256-SHA256 · verification runs in your browser
---
name: regulated-document-author
description: Use when authoring documents that face regulatory scrutiny (SOX internal controls, FDA submissions, IRB protocols, audit packets, GMP records, compliance attestations). Ensures cryptographic provenance, multi-party attestation, and tamper-evident structure.
---
# regulated-document-author
## When to use
The user is producing documentation that will be reviewed by external auditors, regulators, or internal compliance teams — anywhere a chain-of-custody on the documentation matters. Common signals: "SOX control", "FDA submission", "IRB protocol", "audit packet", "GMP record", "compliance attestation".
## Instructions
### Identify the regulatory frame
Determine which regulatory framework applies: SOX (financial controls), FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (electronic records), ICH GCP (clinical trials), HIPAA (health information), defense procurement (DFARS clauses). The framework dictates required document structure, retention period, and signature requirements.
### Structure as addressable regions
Author each document component (control declaration, test of design, test of effectiveness, sign-off, finding) as its own addressable source. Granular regions are independently signable and verifiable.
### Apply separation of duties to attestations
Different actors sign different artifacts. Control owner signs the control declaration. Tester signs the test. Reviewer counter-signs the package.
### Preserve fork lineage on revisions
When a regulated document is revised, fork the original rather than overwrite. The fork-source element preserves verifiable lineage for the audit trail.
### Bundle as the deliverable
The audit packet is the bundle.html, not the database record on a GRC platform. The bundle is self-contained, transferable, verifiable in any browser without a platform account.
·signed byRob Anderson · Memeroot Ltdfp 3df27085aeb8553aclick verify
copied · paste into ~/.claude/skills/regulated-document-author/SKILL.md
What happens when you fork a signed skill
Two organizations took the original skill and specialized it: Acme Health for HIPAA / GxP workflows, Beta Bank for SOX / Basel / FINRA workflows. Each fork carries its own signature plus a fork-source reference back to the original. Click any node to see its provenance — including a real signature verification.
click a node
…
What this enables that copy-paste sharing cannot
A skill is instructions Claude follows. When the skill's outputs face regulatory scrutiny — controls, FDA records, IRB protocols, legal contracts — the consumer needs to know not just what the instructions are, but who wrote them, whether they've been modified, and where the lineage went.
Today, sharing skills means sharing a SKILL.md folder. Trust is implicit. A repository hosts the canonical version; everyone else copies. Modifications are invisible. Forks lose lineage on every copy-paste. The audit story for a regulated-skill use is: "we trusted the source."
Signed skill bundles invert the trust topology. The skill is the artifact; the signature is the publication; verification is local; modifications are visible; forks carry lineage.
What this enables
Skill packs from domain experts. A consultancy publishes signed bundles for a vertical — financial controls, healthcare compliance, legal review. Each skill independently verifiable. Engagement fee is for curation and maintenance, not gatekeeping.
Regulated-skill assurance. A regulator or industry body maintains a list of approved skill-author identities. Skills signed by those identities are pre-approved for use in regulated contexts. The list is just public keys; no central platform required.
Forks with lineage. A user customizes a base skill, signs the fork, distributes. The fork-source element ties their version back. Consumers see both the original author and the customizer. Trust composes.
Pay-gated distribution. Bundle is freely distributable; SKILL.md content is encrypted; decryption requires a payment-derived key. No DRM platform; cryptography handles access control.
Multi-language attribution. Author writes in native language; translator counter-signs the translation; consumers see both signatures on the same skill — original author and translator both verifiable.
What's structurally common: the cryptography distributes trust so no central operator is needed. The bundle distributes the artifact so no service is needed. Signing distributes authorship so no platform identity is needed.
This is the shape of a healthy skill ecosystem — federated, verifiable, transferable, durable. Anthropic ships the substrate (Claude Code reads SKILL.md). Authors ship the artifacts (bundles). Channels distribute (anywhere a file can go). Cryptography handles trust. Nobody owns the trust layer.